The Car You Want vs The Car You Actually Drive

The Daily Vroom

YESTERDAY’S TOP 3 SALES

Want to dive deeper into any of these listings?

Just click on the car to take you directly to the listing.

2022 Lamborghini Essenza SCV12 $1,320,500 (40km)

2018 Porsche 911 Turbo S Exclusive Series $370,000 (33 miles)

2014 Ferrari F12berlinetta $283,000 (29k miles)

Your Cars & Bids Feedback

Yesterday we asked you what matters most for the growth of C&B, here’s how you answered the poll.

The comments were pretty consistent. There’s clear recognition that Cars & Bids is growing and trying new things, but there’s still a perception gap, especially around the quality of cars on the platform.

I’m not sure that’s entirely fair.

As an example, Bring a Trailer sells a huge number of cars every day, and when you actually look at the full mix, it’s not all pristine, top-tier inventory. There’s plenty of higher-mileage cars, modified cars, and average examples that just get lost in the volume. C&B’s mix isn’t dramatically different, it’s just more visible.

The bigger question is whether that actually matters? As long as everything is presented transparently and buyers know what they’re bidding on, there’s a car for everyone. Not every platform needs to be curated at the very top end to work. (we all saw how that worked out for SBX)

Where it does start to matter is on the revenue side. If most of the cars trading are lower value, you need a lot more volume to generate the same fees, and that’s where moving upmarket becomes vitally important. Higher value cars bring in more revenue per transaction, attract a different level of buyer, and help shift perception at the same time. Their highest sale this year was a 2015 Ferrari 458 Spider at $381,000, and that can’t be the outlier if they want revenue to really move.

Got a lot of interesting responses on this – dropping a few of them below.

Teaming up with Velocity is a cool idea. They don’t need to do actual in-person bidding, just activate at the event and generate excitement in real time.

Cars & Bids vehicles feel just a bit above Facebook Marketplace to me. Many of their vehicles seem to have accident history, modifications (not in a good way) and high mileage. I think they need to increase volume as well as the quality. The crazy part about all the “other guys” is they are so far behind BaT.

If they can maintain the 80% sell through rate, the rest should take care of itself if C&B is committed to growth. Everything seems to be there for this to happen. Staff is critical in the growth phase of any business and need to be supported by management to handle going through the ‘too small to be as big as they are and too big to be as small as they are’ phase. I wish them the best, they are significant in the online auction world.

Their quality of product is still lacking. The sellers too often are dealers with seemingly no collector/enthusiast vehicle expertise. BaT has the premium brokers who only wheel and deal in the best cars. If C&B is solely competing on volume, sure – they may get there with some combination of what you've laid out here. But that doesn't change the perception of quality issues that continue to plague their brand.

All of the above is necessary for expansion. Higher $ cars are still a question as to best platforms to list. Seller confidence is important from now on.

Regarding Cars & Bids, I think building scale in a way that creates acceleration which feels like organic growth will serve them well while helping protect sell-through rates. Growth that appears natural and demand-driven builds confidence with both buyers and sellers, whereas forced volume can dilute quality and hurt conversion.

Auctions To Keep An Eye On

This is one of those listings where the photos pull you in, but it’s the spec that keeps you there.

Finished in Tropical Turquoise with the correct two-tone interior, it looks exactly how a ’57 Bel Air Convertible should. But what separates it is everything underneath that first impression. This wasn’t a quick restoration or a one-and-done build. The owner spent years adding to it, stacking options, accessories, and details that most cars like this lost decades ago.

And it shows. The options list is almost excessive, in a good way. Power features, period-correct accessories, the kind of small touches you rarely see all together on one car anymore. It feels like someone set out to build the most complete version possible and actually followed through.

There are plenty of nice ’57s out there. Not many with this level of completeness. That’s what bidders are going to be reacting to at the end.


This Triumph is one of those cars where the spec sheet almost reads like a list of everything people complain about on a standard TR6, and then fixes it one by one.

The original formula is great in theory, simple British roadster, good looks, plenty of character, but in reality they can feel dated pretty quickly once you actually try to use one regularly, whether it’s the brakes, the fueling, or just the general lack of refinement that comes with driving on of these.

What makes this example interesting is that it doesn’t pretend to be a perfect, original car, and it doesn’t really try to live in that world at all. Instead, it leans fully into being a sorted driver, with fuel injection, modern braking, suspension upgrades, and all the small details that make it something you’d actually want to get in and use without thinking twice.

That’s where the trade starts. Because the more you improve a car like this, the less it appeals to the traditional buyer who wants originality and period correctness, and the more it shifts toward someone who just wants the experience without the compromises. There isn’t a right answer there, but it does change how you look at it.

And in this case, it’s done in a way that feels thought through rather than thrown together, which is harder to find than people think, especially on cars that have been modified this heavily over time.

So you’re not really comparing this to other restored TR6s anymore, and you’re definitely not comparing it to untouched cars either. You’re just asking whether this version of the car, with all the modern fixes baked in, is closer to what you’d want than the original ever was.

Because for the right buyer, this is probably a better TR6 than Triumph ever built. And for everyone else, it’s exactly the reason they’d keep looking for a stock one.


This is one of those listings that doesn’t really hook you because of the spec, but because of what it represents once you look a little closer.

On paper, it’s a 1975 911S with a Sportomatic, finished in Desert Beige with a comfort-focused spec that reflects exactly how the original owner wanted to use it. But once you realize it’s Keith Martin’s car and read his piece in Sports Car Market, it stops being about the configuration and starts feeling like a story most people in this space recognize immediately.

He didn’t overthink it when he bought it, the opportunity came up, the spec made sense for where he was at the time, and he went for it. Then he did what people always say they’re going to do but don’t always follow through on, which is actually sort the car properly and then use it. Suspension refreshed, engine work handled, all the small things that turn a car from something you own into something you trust, and then real miles put on it, not just short drives or occasional outings but proper use.

And that’s where the story really sits, because once you start using a car the way you always imagined you would, you also start to understand it properly. The same rawness and feedback that make an older 911 so engaging begin to define how and when you actually want to drive it, and over time that matters more than the idea of the car ever did.

So the decision to move it on isn’t about the car falling short, it’s almost the opposite. It did exactly what it was supposed to do, it delivered the experience, it became part of his routine, and then at some point it stopped fitting that routine as well as something else might.

That’s the part people don’t always talk about, because the narrative is usually about finding the perfect car and keeping it, but the reality is that a lot of ownership is just timing. The right car at the right moment, used the right way, and then let go when that moment passes.

That’s what this feels like. Not a spec play or a market exercise, just a car that was bought, sorted, driven, and now passed on, which is probably closer to how most people actually experience these cars than they’d like to admit.

Enjoying The Daily Vroom?

Pay it forward by sharing this newsletter with an automotive aficionado in your circles. Your endorsement allows us to accelerate our growth.

Send them to thedailyvroom.com to subscribe for free.